{"id":7,"date":"2019-07-05T09:18:37","date_gmt":"2019-07-05T07:18:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/?page_id=7"},"modified":"2021-11-26T18:23:49","modified_gmt":"2021-11-26T17:23:49","slug":"about","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/about\/","title":{"rendered":"Project details"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Scientific Background, Problem Identification and Objective of the Proposed Research<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The 50<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary of the worldwide student and workers movement of 1968, with its impact on Slovenia and other republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, gives this research project the opportunity to address, from the viewpoint of world-systems analysis, the open questions that this \u201cantisystemic movement\u201d (Arrighi, Hopkins &amp; Wallerstein, <em>Antisystemic Movements<\/em>, Verso 1989) poses to contemporary research on world literature, modernism, and the international social movements of the 20<sup>th<\/sup> and 21<sup>st<\/sup> centuries:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Even\nthough the worldwide student and workers movement of the 1960s was\nretroactively reduced to a cultural phenomenon (as shown by Ross, <em>May \u201968 and Its Afterlives<\/em>, U of Chicago\nP 2002), the role of literature and theory in these processes remains\nunderresearched. By comparing the core (Paris) with the periphery (Ljubljana,\nZagreb, Belgrade) of the literary world-system, the project will try to assess\nwhether the radicalism of 1960s modernist literature and critical theory\noffered a starting point to the student and workers movement, rather than a\nmere reflection on (or even a passive witnessing of) the movement. What was the\nrelation between critical theory and the student movement in the European part\nof the core and in the peripheries, in this \u201cage of theory\u201d (Adorno)? Were\nSartre and Marcuse really the only theorists whose status of ideologues of the\nmovement could be compared to that of Rubin, Dutschke, Cohn-Bendit, and other\nactivist leaders? Was there perhaps a distance between the movement and theory?\nFinally, are the subsequent renunciations of both May \u201968 and French\n(post)structuralism proof that the social revolt and theory were overdetermined\nby a common structure?<\/li><li>As\nshown by Combes (<em>Mai 68, les \u00e9crivains,\nla litt\u00e9rature<\/em>, L\u2019Harmattan 2008), French modernist and neo-avant-garde\nexperiments (e.g., Tel Quel, Internationale situationniste) and French\ntheoretical critique of literature as a bourgeois institution formed the basis\nof the French student movement. Additionally, many students were inspired by\nthe Chinese Cultural Revolution\u2014whose origins are themselves symptomatically\nconnected to a critique of the literary. The project will investigate whether\nthe neo-avant-garde transgression of literariness and the theoretical critique\nof the literary had a similar impact in the periphery as well, where there was\na different social and economic formation. Are the analogies between the French\nand the Slovenian case when it comes to the interaction of theory and\nliterature perhaps the result of their common social function in both\nsocieties, namely their shared utopia of a total transformation of the existing\norder, a utopia spanning from sexuality to the mode of production to\ninternational relations and to aesthetics?<\/li><li>By\ncomparing the Parisian core with the Slovenian and Yugoslav periphery, the\nproject will test the hypothesis that the transnational student movement\neffectively functioned as a key medium of increasingly accelerated transfer of\nmodernist and neo-avant-garde theoretical and literary practices from the core\nof the world-system to its periphery.<\/li><li>In\nview of Perry Anderson\u2019s thesis that an imaginative proximity of revolution is\nconstitutive of modernism (\u201cModernity\nand Revolution,\u201d <em>New Left Review <\/em>1984, no. 144), could one not\nargue that the worldwide revolutionary movement of students fashioned a new\nkind of modernism that went beyond a worn-out formalism? Is in this regard the\nmetropole of Paris really significantly different from the periphery of\nSlovenia and Yugoslavia? <\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-3 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"1012\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1037-1-1024x1012.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"507\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/sample-page\/11-12-06-68_mai_68-_nuit_demeutes-_manif-_barricades-degats_1968_-_53fi1037-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-507\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1037-1-1024x1012.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1037-1-300x297.jpg 300w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1037-1-768x759.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1037-1-304x300.jpg 304w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1037-1.jpg 1800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">1<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"831\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tel-Quel-1-1-831x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"511\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/sample-page\/tel-quel-1-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-511\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tel-Quel-1-1-831x1024.jpg 831w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tel-Quel-1-1-243x300.jpg 243w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tel-Quel-1-1-768x947.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tel-Quel-1-1.jpg 1388w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 831px) 100vw, 831px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">2<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"406\" height=\"600\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-47-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"509\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/sample-page\/es-326-47-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-509\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-47-1.jpg 406w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-47-1-203x300.jpg 203w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 406px) 100vw, 406px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">3<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-light-gray-background-color has-background has-small-font-size\">Picture 1: Student protest in Toulouse, June 1968 (source: Wikimedia commons).<br>Picture 2: Title page of <em>Tel Quel<\/em>, summer 1968: revolution, literature, and theory<br>Picture 3: Student protests \u2013 the occupation of the Faculty of arts, Ljubljana, May 1971 (photo: Edi \u0160elhaus, source: Muzej novej\u0161e zgodovine Slovenije) <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To critically reflect on the historical distance to the last phase of modernism, the project will take into consideration both the dominant accounts of May \u201968 and the recent alternative readings. To this end, the project will also analyze the conditions in which utopianism (both political and aesthetic) still seemed possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>State-of-the-Art in the Proposed Field of Research and Survey of the Relevant Literature<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>According\nto Jameson (<em>A Singular Modernity<\/em>,\nVerso 2002) and Anderson (\u201cModernity\nand Revolution\u201d), the modernism of the first decades of the 20<sup>th<\/sup>\ncentury is characterized by resistance to the commodification of culture and by\nan imaginative proximity of revolution. Nonetheless, after World War II the\npotential of this modernism itself is said to have been either commodified and\ncanonized (core modernisms) or lost in belated repetition (peripheral\nmodernisms).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The\nEurocentric view that the origin and the measure of modernity reside solely in\nWestern metropoles was recently countered by the conception of plural\nmodernisms (e.g., <em>Geomodernisms<\/em>, ed.\nDoyle &amp; Winkiel, Indiana UP 2005; <em>Translocal\nModernisms<\/em>, ed. Santos &amp; Ribeiro, Lang 2008; <em>The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms<\/em>, ed. Wollaeger &amp;\nEatough, Oxford UP 2012; Friedman,<em>\nPlanetary Modernisms<\/em>, Columbia UP 2015). However, this conception itself\nmasks the single ideological and economic background of the various modernisms,\nhollowing out the very notion of modernism in the process. Hence, the project\nwill undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of the literary texts\nrelated to May \u201968 in an attempt to develop a world-systemic model of\nmodernism. Following Jameson, it will test the hypothesis that the essence of\nmodernism is to be found neither in the Western metropoles nor in the global\nperiphery, but rather in the asymmetrical structure of relations between\nparticular modernisms within the modern world-system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As\nshown by Moretti (<em>Distant Reading<\/em>,\nVerso 2013), the periphery of the literary world-system is forced into a\ncompromise between foreign, Western forms and local topics and viewpoints.\nMoretti further claims that modernism was \u201cthe last creative drive of European\nliterature\u201d (or, as he stated earlier in his <em>Signs Taken for Wonders <\/em>[Verso 1983], \u201cthe last <em>literary season <\/em>of\nWestern culture\u201d). In his view, modernism as the last season of innovative\nEuropean literature was followed by the rise of postcolonial literatures as the\nnew main provider of innovation in the literary world-system. As it was shown\nrecently, May \u201968, too, drew inspiration from and supported the anticolonial\nstruggle. Hence, the proposed project will argue that the worldwide\nantisystemic movement of students (seeking an alliance with workers), too,\nsucceeded in revitalizing modernism\u2014which within the aesthetic field is\nessentially an antisystemic current. The project will scrutinize this claim in\nview of peripheral modernisms such as Slovenian modernism and neo-avant-gardes.\nIt will propose and test the hypothesis that the last season of modernism in fact\ntook place in a periphery, precisely as a kind of a singular compromise with\nforeign forms. Could it be that such a periphery revitalized global modernism\nby local neo-avant-garde practices and theory (e.g., the OHO group or \u017di\u017eek)?\nThe project will test the hypothesis that the last season of modernism is the\nperiod when a society like peripheral Slovenia, as part of socialist and\nnon-aligned Yugoslavia, synchronized itself, via the worldwide student\nmovement, with the core, thus realizing the inherent tendency of modernism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Limited\nfor this presentation on book-length studies, the state of the art in the\nresearch on May \u201968 in relation to the focus of the project can be divided into\nthree levels: a) the world, b) Yugoslavia, and c) Slovenia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A)\nAs is well known, May \u201968 signifies a transformative political, social, and\ncultural movement on the global scale. The capitalist West and the socialist\nSecond World both experienced the irruption of their unpredictable and\napparently anarchic energies. As a major global event, May \u201968 and the subsequent\ndevelopments in the early seventies were relatively well documented and\nstudied, beginning with the 10<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary of the May events.\nOpposing both the mythologization and revisionist denunciation of May \u201968, many\nindividual national histories have studied its documents; for example,\nBerglieb\u2019 <em>1968: Literatur in der\nantiautor\u00e4ren Bewegung<\/em> (Suhrkamp 1993) meticulously presents the sources of\nthe revolt in West Germany as well as the role of literary intellectuals, critical\ntheorists, and philosophers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-3 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-2 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1018\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1027-1-1018x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"514\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/11-12-06-68_mai_68-_nuit_demeutes-_manif-_barricades-degats_1968_-_53fi1027-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-514\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1027-1-1018x1024.jpg 1018w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1027-1-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1027-1-298x300.jpg 298w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1027-1-768x773.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/11-12.06.68_Mai_68._Nuit_d\u00e9meutes._Manif._Barricades.D\u00e9g\u00e2ts_1968_-_53Fi1027-1.jpg 1759w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1018px) 100vw, 1018px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">4<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"657\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ex\u00e8rcit_al_Z\u00f3calo-28_dagost_wiki-1-1024x657.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"516\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/exercit_al_zocalo-28_dagost_wiki-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-516\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ex\u00e8rcit_al_Z\u00f3calo-28_dagost_wiki-1-1024x657.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ex\u00e8rcit_al_Z\u00f3calo-28_dagost_wiki-1-300x193.jpg 300w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ex\u00e8rcit_al_Z\u00f3calo-28_dagost_wiki-1-768x493.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ex\u00e8rcit_al_Z\u00f3calo-28_dagost_wiki-1-468x300.jpg 468w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">5<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"772\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ludwig_Binder_Haus_der_Geschichte_Studentenrevolte_1968_2001_03_0275.0148_17076461192-wiki-2-1024x772.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"518\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/ludwig_binder_haus_der_geschichte_studentenrevolte_1968_2001_03_0275-0148_17076461192-wiki-2-2\/\" class=\"wp-image-518\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ludwig_Binder_Haus_der_Geschichte_Studentenrevolte_1968_2001_03_0275.0148_17076461192-wiki-2.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ludwig_Binder_Haus_der_Geschichte_Studentenrevolte_1968_2001_03_0275.0148_17076461192-wiki-2-300x226.jpg 300w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ludwig_Binder_Haus_der_Geschichte_Studentenrevolte_1968_2001_03_0275.0148_17076461192-wiki-2-768x579.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Ludwig_Binder_Haus_der_Geschichte_Studentenrevolte_1968_2001_03_0275.0148_17076461192-wiki-2-398x300.jpg 398w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">6<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-light-gray-background-color has-background has-small-font-size\">Picture 4: Student protest in front of the national radio-television office (ORTF), Toulouse, June 1968  (source: Wikimedia commons) <br>Picture 5: Armored vehicles in Mexico City, 1968 (source: Wikimedia commons)<br>Picture 6: Anti-Vietnam protest in West Berlin, 1968  (source: Wikimedia commons) <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However,\nthe existing writing on May \u201968 largely concentrates on Paris and France,\nespecially on the relationships between the student movement, the university,\nand counterculture. Within the discussions of the events in France, a valuable\nchange of focus has been proposed by Combes. In his <em>Mai 68, les \u00e9crivains, la litt\u00e9rature<\/em> (L\u2019Harmattan 2008), Combes\ncarefully reconstructs how controversies in and about literature shaped the\nintellectual climate of May \u201968. The project will draw on Combes\u2019 insight that\nthe transformations of the literary (as reflected both in literature and\ntheory) added an essential dimension to the revolutionary drive of the student\nmovement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The\ninitial focus on France and particularly Paris has at least since the 20<sup>th<\/sup>\nanniversary of May \u201968 been superseded by a global viewpoint. This broadening\nof perspective has been achieved especially by such projects as Wallersteinian\nworld-systems analysis and Ross\u2019 book <em>May\n\u201968 and Its Afterlives<\/em> (U of Chicago P 2002). The world-systems take on May\n\u201968 is exemplified by Arrighi, Hopkins, and Wallerstein in their <em>Antisystemic Movements <\/em>(Verso 1989) and\n\u201c1989, the Continuation of 1968\u201d (<em>Review<\/em>\n1992, no. 2). There, May \u201968 is viewed as one of only two world revolutions:\njust as 1848 was a failed but world-scale return to 1789, so too 1968 was a\nfailed but world-scale return to 1917; and just as 1848 institutionalized the\noriginal Left as a rehearsal for 1917, so too 1968 institutionalized the New\nLeft as a rehearsal for 1989. In this account, the revolution of 1968 as a\nmajor antisystemic movement aimed to transform the world-system under the US\nhegemony (which confronted the socialist bloc during the Cold War) by acting\nbeyond and against the institutions of the \u201cold Left.\u201d This is why the\napparently \u201canarchic\u201d political practice of the young generation, favouring\nspontaneity, so enthusiastically embraced counterculture (i.e., the\nunconventional, anti-bourgeois, and Dionysiac behavior in daily life and in\naesthetics)\u2014in contradistinction to the moral \u201cpurism\u201d of the old leftist\nrevolutionary parties. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By\n2002, the \u201cobjectivist\u201d position of the world-system was supplemented by Ross\u2019\n\u201csubjectivist\u201d viewpoint of political subjectivation. Ross\u2019 book, too, rebukes\nthe Cold-War reception of May \u201968 as a mere generational countercultural revolt\nby expanding the spatio-temporal perspective. But if the Wallersteinian\nexpansion followed Braudelian <em>longue\ndur\u00e9e<\/em>, Ross\u2019 expansion follows Foucauldian archeology of knowledge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet\nsuch a broadening of the evental (<em>\u00e9v\u00e9nementiel<\/em>) in the direction of the\nconjunctural (<em>conjoncturel<\/em>) enables us not only to demythologize\ncounterculture, but also to conceptualize culture as such. And while both\nWallersteinians and Ross have achieved the former, they have arguably neglected\nthe latter. While they both successfully broaden the perspective beyond the\nevent of a countercultural explosion, they still observe culture in general\nfrom the evental perspective. The present project will thus take the new,\nexpanded point of view and use it to look at the culture of May \u201968. To this\nend, it will rely on recent studies that have been returning to Braudel and\nFoucault themselves to demonstrate that they already allow for a discussion of\nmodern culture from a conjunctural position; Braudel has recently been reread\nin this way by Casanova and Moretti, and Foucault by Ranci\u00e8re. This, together\nwith a new approach to books like Caute\u2019s <em>The\nYear of the Barricades<\/em> (Harper &amp; Row 1988) and the collective volume <em>Les ann\u00e9es 68<\/em> (Complexe 2000), will\nallow our project to conceptualize culture and art as we focus on their social\nrole during the 1968 revolt in Yugoslavia and particularly Slovenia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19710500_izredna-6-1-693x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-521\" width=\"389\" height=\"583\"\/><figcaption>Student magazine <em>Tribuna<\/em> (Ljubljana, May 1971), special issue: timeline of student protests <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Student_Marx68-1-738x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-524\" width=\"411\" height=\"577\"\/><figcaption>Title page of the magazine <em>Student<\/em> (Beograd, 21 May 1968)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>B)\nWith Yugoslavia and particularly Slovenia in the centre of our project,\ncritical studies of Yugoslavia represent the second, intermediate level of the\nstate of the art. Such studies have been undertaken by Klasi\u0107, Jakovljevi\u0107,\nDjuri\u0107 and \u0160uvakovi\u0107, Kanzleiter and Stojakovi\u0107, and others. Klasi\u0107\u2019s book <em>Jugoslavija i svijet<\/em> <em>1968<\/em> (Ljevak 2012) shows that Yugoslav\nstudent movement was specific to the unique geopolitical and economic position\nof non-aligned and self-managed Yugoslavia, while also being integrated into\nthe global movement via its forms (e.g., student occupation, sit-ins,\nalternative universities) and demands (e.g., social equality). Another\nsingle-authored book on Yugoslav 1968 is Jakovljevi\u0107\u2019s <em>Alienation Effects<\/em> (U of Michigan P 2016). Jakovljevi\u0107 links\nYugoslav performance art to the country\u2019s self-management. This attempt at\ndemocratization of both art and economy resulted in a culture difficult to\nclassify. From this perspective, the student protests of 1968 are just one\nearly case of this culture, according to Jakovljevi\u0107. When it comes to edited volumes,\nDjuri\u0107 and \u0160uvakovi\u0107\u2019s <em>Impossible Histories<\/em> (MIT P 2003) is the first\ninfluential survey of Yugoslav artistic experiments from the avant-garde to the\nneo-avant-garde. The combination of Austro-Hungarian, French, German, Italian,\nand Turkish influences gave Yugoslav avant-garde a distinct character unlike\nthose of other East-Central European avant-gardes, the contributors argue; and\nthe unique trajectory of postwar Yugoslavia distinguished Yugoslav\nneo-avant-garde as well. Finally, Kanzleiter and Stojakovi\u0107\u2019s<em> 1968 in\nJugoslawien<\/em> (Dietz 2008), an edited volume published at the 40<sup>th<\/sup>\nanniversary of May \u201968, addresses the Yugoslav case as a major lacuna in\ninternational studies of May \u201968. The irreducibility of this case, where the\nruling party was the only ruling power globally to perceive the demonstrations\nas a continuation of its own politics, is approached in the volume from the\nperspective of Yugoslav economic self-management and geopolitical\nnon-alignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-3 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-3 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"479\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/DE4144_594-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"527\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/de4144_594-2-2\/\" class=\"wp-image-527\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/DE4144_594-2.jpg 800w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/DE4144_594-2-300x180.jpg 300w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/DE4144_594-2-768x460.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/DE4144_594-2-500x300.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">7<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"399\" height=\"600\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-6-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"529\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/es-326-6-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-529\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-6-1.jpg 399w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-6-1-200x300.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 399px) 100vw, 399px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">8<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"562\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-26-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"531\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/es-326-26-2-2\/\" class=\"wp-image-531\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-26-2.jpg 800w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-26-2-300x211.jpg 300w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-26-2-768x540.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-26-2-427x300.jpg 427w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">9<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"519\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-27-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"533\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/es-326-27-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-533\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-27-1.jpg 800w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-27-1-300x195.jpg 300w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-27-1-768x498.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-27-1-462x300.jpg 462w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">10<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-light-gray-background-color has-background has-small-font-size\">Picture 7: Students protesting against the Soviet occupation of Czechoslovakia, Ljubljana, 1968 (fragment; photo: Svetozar Busi\u0107, source: Muzej novej\u0161e zgodovine Slovenije)<br>Picture 8: Students protesting against the traffic noise in A\u0161ker\u010deva street, Ljubljana, April 1971 (fragment; photo:  Edi \u0160elhaus, source: Muzej novej\u0161e zgodovine Slovenije) <br>Pictures 9, 10: Student protests \u2013 the occupation of the Faculty of arts, Ljubljana, Maj 1971 (photo: Edi \u0160elhaus, source: Muzej novej\u0161e zgodovine Slovenije)  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This\nproject will broaden Klasi\u0107\u2019s focus on Belgrade to include its relation to\nLjubljana and Zagreb. It will also expand Jakovljevi\u0107\u2019s framework, adding\nliterature to performance art, and geopolitical non-alignment to economic\nself-management. Additionally, our project will return to the topic of <em>Impossible\nHistories<\/em> by adding the perspectives of world-systems and world-economy.\nFinally, the project will deepen the approach set forth in <em>1968 in\nJugoslawien<\/em> by zooming in on Slovenia and by adding the level of Yugoslav\nartistic practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>C)\nFinally, although Slovenian literary history has not yet posed the question of\nhow modernist literature, neo-avant-garde literary texts, critical theory, and\nthe literary media both shaped and were shaped by the Yugoslav student movement\nof 1968\u201372, there are also a few book-length studies on Slovenian May \u201968 that\nthe project can work with. In 1982, a group of sociologists who had\nparticipated in the student movement published <em>\u0160tudentsko gibanje 1968\u201372<\/em> (ZSMS 1982), a richly prefaced and\nannotated selection of texts published between 1968\u201372 in Slovenian student\nmagazines and other outlets; this remains the most useful document of the\nSlovenian student movement to date, from its unionist phase, to its\nradicalization in the direction of global politics, to a final split with the\nliterary and artistic part of the membership. This volume and the period it\ncovers is also the main focus of Mihevc\u2019s <em>Klju\u010d\nje v na\u0161ih rokah! <\/em>(Univerza 2008), a recent book on the impact of student\nprotests on university politics in modern Europe. Finally, Ram\u0161ak\u2019s 2013\ndissertation <em>Opore\u010dni\u0161tvo v samoupravnem\nsocializmu<\/em> was published as a book in 2018. Ram\u0161ak\u2019s focus on Slovenian\ndissidents in socialist Yugoslavia leads him to a thorough discussion of the\n1968\u201372 student movement in Slovenia and the rest of Yugoslavia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our project will build on <em>\u0160tudentsko gibanje 1968\u201372<\/em> to locate and analyze the main literary and artistic manifestations of the movement, which are especially characteristic of the second, most radical and internationalist phase. In this way, the project will also supplement Mihevc\u2019s book, which lacks a cultural dimension. Finally, this will enable the project to contribute to the topic of Slovenian dissidents, where Ram\u0161ak\u2019s recent book calls for a discussion of literature and theatre as mediums of Yugoslav dissidents. On this basis, our project will study Slovenian literary modernism within the transformative historical conjuncture of 1968 and in the world-system perspective; it will analyze the political events, the counterculture, literature, and theory in Slovenia as so many (semi)peripheral developments at the intersection of the literary and economic world-systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>A Detailed Description of the Work Programme<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>During\nthe last fifty years, May \u201968 as the most significant global antisystemic\nmovement has predominantly been portrayed as a revolt led by students and\nworkers around the world against state-led industrial society typical both for\nthe US hegemony and for the Soviet alternative. As such, the revolution tends\nto be associated, on one side, with NATO member states such as France, and, on\nthe other, with members of the Warsaw Pact such as Czechoslovakia. However, May\n\u201968 also had massive resonance in Yugoslavia, a country that not only was\naligned neither to NATO nor to the Soviet bloc but was even the leader of the\nNon-Aligned Movement, a worldwide attempt to oppose both geopolitical blocs.\nYugoslavia (and Slovenia as its constitutive part) is thus a rare case of May\n\u201968 going beyond the critique of the Cold-War stalemate; a case where this\ncritique of both the US and the USSR was always already the official position\nof the regime itself; a case where Fordist industrial society common both to\nthe capitalist West and the real-socialist East was challenged by the experiment\nof workers\u2019 self-management, which Yugoslavia introduced two decades before\n1968 and abolished two decades after it. What was, then, the object of critique\nin and following 1968 in a country like Yugoslavia?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The\nresearch project described here will address this question starting from the\nhypothesis that in Slovenia, apparently the most \u201cwesternized\u201d republic of\nsocialist Yugoslavia, more than in many other countries, critique voiced or\ninspired by May \u201968 was displaced from the field of politics to that of culture\nand literature. Specifically, as the anti-imperialist concerns of the \u201968\nmovement were largely shared by official Yugoslav foreign policies, the\nprotesters in Yugoslavia focused less on the Cold War than on Yugoslavia\nitself, and within it less on critical economic analysis than on the more\ngeneral cultural issues of social inequality (within and outside the\nuniversity), inequality resulting from the Communist Party\u2019s reformist efforts\nto combine socialist self-management with the principles of Western market\neconomy. In France or, say, the US, the counterculture that accompanied the\ngeneral strikes and the student revolts of 1968 was a highly visible yet\nquickly commodifiable dimension of the revolt (as noted, say, by world-systems\nanalysts and Ross, <em>May \u201968 and Its\nAfterlives<\/em>); at the same time, this counterculture, where student protests\nwere more vocal than workers\u2019 strikes, was arguably at the centre of revolt in\nYugoslavia (see Klasi\u0107, <em>Jugoslavija i\nsvijet<\/em> <em>1968<\/em>). Hence also a\nrelatively important role of modernist literature, counterculture,\nneo-avant-garde groups, and manifestos as well as philosophy and critical\ntheory, all key cultural mediums of the era. The international student movement\nhas helped introduce Yugoslav society to the radical modernist practices of\nParis and other metropoles of the literary world-system, where critique of\nbourgeois politics and economy but also of aesthetics, literature, and\nsexuality brought together literary innovations from early 20<sup>th<\/sup>-century\nmodernisms and the critical theoretical discourse that just emerged at the time\nout of a deconstructed continental philosophy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-3 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-4 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"731\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/1970_Problemi_PU_Naslovnica-3-731x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"538\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/1970_problemi_pu_naslovnica-3\/\" class=\"wp-image-538\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/1970_Problemi_PU_Naslovnica-3-731x1024.jpg 731w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/1970_Problemi_PU_Naslovnica-3-214x300.jpg 214w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/1970_Problemi_PU_Naslovnica-3-768x1076.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 731px) 100vw, 731px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">11<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"569\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Index_slo_manifesti-2-569x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"540\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/index_slo_manifesti-2-2\/\" class=\"wp-image-540\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Index_slo_manifesti-2-569x1024.jpg 569w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Index_slo_manifesti-2-167x300.jpg 167w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Index_slo_manifesti-2-768x1382.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 569px) 100vw, 569px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">12<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"726\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/V0001326-1-726x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"542\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/v0001326-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-542\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/V0001326-1-726x1024.jpg 726w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/V0001326-1-213x300.jpg 213w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/V0001326-1-768x1083.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 726px) 100vw, 726px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">13<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-light-gray-background-color has-background has-small-font-size\">Picture 11: <em>Problemi<\/em> 1970 &#8211; Programmed Art<br>Picture 12: A page from the Novi Sad student magazine <em>Index<\/em> (18 October 1968): translation of Slovenian neo-avant-garde manifestos<br>Picture 13: Object OHO &#8211; 2 poems (1966; source: Moderna galerija, Ljubljana)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some\nof the most world-renowned oeuvres produced by citizens of Yugoslavia\n(Abramovi\u0107\u2019s performance art, the OHO group\u2019s conceptual art, Black Wave film,\n\u0160alamun\u2019s poetry, \u017di\u017eek\u2019s critical theory) go back to the 1960s. Together with\naesthetic currents from other locales of the semi-periphery of the world-system\n(notably the Latin American Boom), these and similar phenomena arguably gave a\nsecond life to the hitherto Europe-based modernism, which by the sixties was\nlimited to such forms as <em>nouveau roman <\/em>(see\nAnderson, \u201cModernity and Revolution\u201d).\nThis final season of European modernism was followed in the core of the system\nby post-modernism in aesthetics and neo-conservatism in politics, with many\nprotagonists of May \u201968 becoming \u201cnew philosophers\u201d critical of socialism and\nrevolution in the name of liberalism and human rights. As for Slovenia and\nother Yugoslav republics, the final season of European modernism was followed\nby a party-led suspense of liberal reforms, a crisis of the economic,\npolitical, and cultural experiment that was self-management, a dissolution of\nthe state more violent than in any other socialist country, and the emergence\nof independent successor states. In these new states, which by now are either\nin or on their path to the EU, modernism has been immunized by being accepted\ninto the state institutions of art. This outcome of the final season of\nmodernism offers a backdrop against which the radical modernism of the sixties\nreveals itself as having been deeply integrated, via the student movement\naround the world, into the structures of everyday life, but in a way that made\nit function within these structures as a utopian alternative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-5 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"798\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/moma_catalogue_1970_OHO_2686_300337616-2-1-798x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"545\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/moma_catalogue_1970_oho_2686_300337616-2-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-545\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/moma_catalogue_1970_OHO_2686_300337616-2-1-798x1024.jpg 798w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/moma_catalogue_1970_OHO_2686_300337616-2-1-234x300.jpg 234w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/moma_catalogue_1970_OHO_2686_300337616-2-1-768x986.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/moma_catalogue_1970_OHO_2686_300337616-2-1.jpg 1293w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 798px) 100vw, 798px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">14<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"734\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/V0006536-2-734x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"547\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/v0006536-2-3\/\" class=\"wp-image-547\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/V0006536-2-734x1024.jpg 734w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/V0006536-2-215x300.jpg 215w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/V0006536-2-768x1072.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 734px) 100vw, 734px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">15<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-light-gray-background-color has-background has-small-font-size\">Picture 14: Covers of the exhibition catalogue <em>Information<\/em> (Museum of Modern Art, New York, Summer 1970), which includes the Slovenian group OHO<br>Picture 15: Milenko Matanovi\u0107: Intercontinental project America &#8211; Europe (from the catalogue <em>Information<\/em>; source: Moderna Galerija v Ljubljani)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The\nevents metonymically termed <em>May \u201968<\/em>\nresonated both in the venerated halls of Sorbonne, where students displayed\ntheir red and black flags, and on the peaks of the Himalaya, where the foremost\nclimber of the period ceased to display the national flag after learning about\nthe events. Protesters included both anonymous industrial workers in Southern\nFrance and already (in)famous student leaders in Paris; the movement engulfed\nboth students in Mexico and workers in Italy, and students both of Columbia\nUniversity and of South Carolina State University. However, the events were\nalso met with disapproval both by liberal and by socialist regimes; they were\nrejected both by such incorrigible humanists as Adorno and by such provocative\nanti-humanists as Lacan. Given this enormous scope of the events, it is all the\nmore remarkable that such central parts of the field of culture as literature\nand critical theory have so far been relatively neglected in scholarly accounts\nof May \u201968, as these have mainly limited their focus on politics and economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These\nare hence the two main problems that appear once we approach May \u201968 from the\nperspective of Yugoslavia. First, if May \u201968 was above all a worldwide critique\nof both the Western hegemony and the Eastern alternative, why was its impact so\nstrong even in a country rejecting both geopolitical blocs? Second, if May \u201968\nimpacted all the social spheres all around the world, why do its literary,\nphilosophical, and overall cultural dimensions come to the fore only once we\nfocus on a country like Slovenia, a republic of a non-aligned socialist\nYugoslav federation?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In terms of the aims of the described project, the following sets of Slovenian texts and contexts from 1965 to 1975 will be investigated, each compared with developments in Paris as the core of the literary world-system as well as with those in Yugoslavia as an in-between periphery (Belgrade, Zagreb, etc.):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>A. Literature<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Texts:\nstudent bulletins, periodicals (<em>Tribuna<\/em>,<em> Problemi<\/em>, etc.), manifestos,\navant-garde collective volumes (<em>Pericare\u017eeracirep<\/em>,\n<em>Katalog<\/em>, <em>Edicije OHO<\/em>, etc.), book series (\u201cZnamenja\u201d etc.), self-published\nbooks and books published by state publishers, literature aired on the\nLjubljana student radio (R\u0160);<\/li><li>the\nreception and re-writing of metropolitan modernist forms and topics in Slovenia\n(dadaism and surrealism, nouveau roman, situationism, Tel Quel, concrete\npoetry, lettrism, land art, etc.).<\/li><li>The\nfocus: the literary and transliterary production of neo-avant-garde groups\n(OHO, Katalog, Nomenklatura, etc.) and individual writers (Kermauner, \u0160alamun,\nHan\u017eek, Geister, Svetina, \u0160vabi\u0107, Jovanovi\u010d, Rupel, Zlobec, Filip\u010di\u010d,\nZagori\u010dnik, Chubby, Dekleva, Detela, Gaj\u0161ek, et al.) in comparison with French\n(post)structuralism, situationism, Tel Quel, and nouveau noveau roman.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-3 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-6 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"712\" height=\"1009\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Problemi_1968-067-068_Katalog-82-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"550\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/problemi_1968-067-068_katalog-82-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-550\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Problemi_1968-067-068_Katalog-82-1.jpg 712w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Problemi_1968-067-068_Katalog-82-1-212x300.jpg 212w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 712px) 100vw, 712px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">16<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"699\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19680617-1-1-699x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"552\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/tribuna_19680617-1-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-552\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19680617-1-1-699x1024.jpg 699w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19680617-1-1-205x300.jpg 205w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19680617-1-1-768x1125.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19680617-1-1.jpg 1345w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 699px) 100vw, 699px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">17<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"707\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19720121-1-1-707x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"554\" data-link=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/sample-page\/tribuna_19720121-1-1\/\" class=\"wp-image-554\" srcset=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19720121-1-1-707x1024.jpg 707w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19720121-1-1-207x300.jpg 207w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19720121-1-1-768x1112.jpg 768w, https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19720121-1-1.jpg 1140w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 707px) 100vw, 707px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">18<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-light-gray-background-color has-background has-small-font-size\">Picture 16: Iztok Geister (group OHO), a theory-literature hybrid, <em>Problemi &#8211; Katalog<\/em>, 1968<br>Picture 17: Cover page of the student magazine <em>Tribuna<\/em> (17 June 1968) <br>Picture 18: Cover page of the student magazine <em>Tribuna<\/em> (21 January 1972) <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>B.<\/em> <em>Critical\ntheory<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Texts:\nperiodicals (<em>Problemi<\/em>, <em>Tribuna<\/em>, etc.), bulletins, book series,\nand individual books;<\/li><li>references\nto and the reception and influence of: Marxism (from Marx to Mao); Djilas and\nthe Yugoslav \u201cPraxis\u201d school; prominent leaders and intellectuals of the\nworldwide student movement (Rubin, Dutschke, Cohn-Bendit, Sartre, Marcuse,\netc.); French structuralism, Lacanian psychoanalysis, Althusserian historical\nmaterialism, early post-structuralism; Frankfurt school; Italian workerism and\nautonomism.<\/li><li>The\nfocus: peripheral Ljubljana as the place of origin of theories that, developing\nmatrices adopted from the French theory, quickly gained international acclaim\n(the Ljubljana school of Lacanian psychoanalysis: \u017di\u017eek, Dolar, Salecl, Mo\u010dnik,\nRotar, Sku\u0161ek, et al.).<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>C. Culture and counterculture<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Student\nculture, hippies, alternative university, teach-ins; rock and consumer culture;\nFordist workers\u2019 culture; East European proto-dissidence.<\/li><li>The\nfocus: study stays of Slovenian intellectuals and writers in Paris and the US\nas a gateway to modernization and westernization (between leftist radicalism\nand classical liberalism).<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>D. Reflections and memories of May \u201968 in literature and theory<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Narrativization\nof the events in fiction and drama between experience and memory, and between\nmythology and distancing (Rupel\u2019s <em>Tajnik\n\u0161este internacionale<\/em>, \u0160vabi\u0107\u2019s <em>\u0160und\nroman<\/em>, Jovanovi\u010d\u2019s <em>Igrajte tumor v\nglavi<\/em>, Dolenc\u2019s<em> Vampir z Gorjancev<\/em>,\nDekleva\u2019s <em>Oko v zraku<\/em> and <em>Pimlico<\/em>, etc.);<\/li><li>the\ntradition of May \u201968 in the theory of the civil society movements of the 1980s\n(radical left, human rights activists, feminists, LGBT, ecologists, etc.).<\/li><li>The\nfocus: what has become of May \u201968 and ist transformative drive in the period of\npostmodernism, postcommunism, and neoliberalism?<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/es-326-40-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-558\" width=\"327\" height=\"488\"\/><figcaption>Student protest against the traffic noise in A\u0161ker\u010deva street, Ljubljana, April 1971 (photo: Edi \u0160elhaus, source: Muzej novej\u0161e zgodovine Slovenije) <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The\nproject team will study the various kinds of relevant text listed above by\nemploying qualitative methods (critical textual interpretation and close\nreading) as well as quantitative analysis of data obtained from the text\ncorpus. To this end, the project will produce and, applying the most advanced\napproaches in digital humanities, analyze the archive of Slovenian literary and\ntheoretical production of the period 1965\u20131975. First, the existing full-length\ndigital copies of the student periodicals that are publicly accessible in the\nDigital Library of Slovenia (dLib) will be examined to provide a selection of\nrelevant texts. These are texts related to the events of 1968\u201372 thematically,\nreferentially, or by the contexts of their publication or production. The\nselection will be bibliographically registered, split in separate searchable\ntexts, provided with basic metadata and analytical descriptions and stored in a\ndigital repository. An application based on XML technology will generate the\nweb publication of the relevant texts as well as enable their dynamic\npresentation and analysis according to particular categories (genre, author,\ngender, generation, date, etc.). Additionally, other relevant publications not\nyet included in dLib (such as student bulletins) will be scanned and\ntransformed into a searchable format. Composing a digital archive will not be\nan end in itself, but will rather serve as a prerequisite for quantitative and\nqualitative corpus analysis. This analysis will be focused on the question of\ntransformations in four distinct yet closely interconnected social spheres:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><em>the national and literary language<\/em>: starting from the hypothesis that the 1960s mark a significant linguistic change in modern literary cultures, the project team will identify symptoms of the decentralization of literary language (as it was based on the national literary canon); a key symptom seems to be the increase in the use of elements and structures borrowed outside the literary and the national, mainly from sociolects, slang, minoritarian languages, historical and dialectal varieties of Slovenian, and foreign languages (South Slavic languages, English, Italian, German); special emphasis will be placed on tracing the emergence of <em>\u00e9criture feminine<\/em> in the archived texts;<\/li><li><em>the relationship between literature and visual arts<\/em>: starting from the hypothesis that the 1960s mark the beginning of the predominance of visual media over the print, the project team will elucidate the share, semantics, and syntax of non-linguistic, iconic texts and visual-literary hybrids in print (\u201cKritik der Bleiw\u00fcste\u201d [\u201ccritique of dense text\u201d] and the raising prevalence of the visual in German publications of theory around 1968 was also noted in Felsch\u2019s <em>Der lange Sommer der Theorie<\/em> [C.H. Beck 2015]);<\/li><li><em>the generational structure of the public sphere<\/em>: starting from the hypothesis that the conjuncture of 1968 marks the formation of students as a new political subject in the public sphere, the project team will assess the different age groups of authors that appear or are mentioned in the proposed archive of serial publications;<\/li><li><em>the patriarchal structures of post-war society and women\u2019s emancipation<\/em>: as the 1968 revolt coincided with second-wave feminism and engendered several ensuing civil society movements, including feminism and LGBT, the project team will obtain quantitative data about the representation of women authors and feminist issues in the proposed corpus.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Methodologically,\nthe project will be an interdisciplinary investigation combining the approaches\nand the findings of contemporary world-systems analysis with those of recent\nmodernism studies and world literature studies, especially those approaches\nthat refer to world-systems analysts and can hence be used to retool and refine\nthe world-systems perspective according to the needs of literary research. In\nthis way, the research on economic history conducted by Wallerstein, Arrighi,\nHopkins, and other world-systems analysts will be used to draw out relevant\nanalogies between the various centres of the \u201968 revolt without having to rely\non Cold-War oppositions. And the work on world literature done recently by\nCasanova (<em>La R\u00e9publique mondiale des Lettres<\/em>, Seuil 1999), Moretti (<em>Distant Reading<\/em>, Verso 2013), Beecroft (<em>An\nEcology of World Literature<\/em>, Verso\n2015), and other literary historians who have been adapting world-systems\nanalysis for literary studies will serve the proposed project in its endeavor\nto add to the world-systems perspective the kind of concretization that can be\noffered by world literature studies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On this basis, the project will follow relevant strands of contemporary modernism studies and digital humanities in order to collect the literary material in question; polysystems theory and the theory of intertextuality, in order to structure the collected literary material; emerging critical studies of Yugoslavia, in order to zoom in on the literary and overall cultural scene in the 1960s and 1970s Yugoslavia; and, finally, the state of the art in individual philologies, notably Slovenian studies, in order to analyze and interpret selected literary and theoretical texts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Project Management: Detailed Implementation Plan and Timetable<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The work of the project team composed of researchers at different career stages will be organized on a daily basis and managed by the project leader using shared online platforms (e.g., Dropbox and Google Docs) as well as trimonthly work meetings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The\nstructure and scope of the project team, as well as its membership in the\nprogram team of the host institute, will enable sufficient flexibility,\nguaranteeing in unforeseeable events such as illness a successful realization\nof the project goals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The work on the project will be organized according to the following timetable:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Archival work in Slovenian\nlibraries and archives as well as in the dLib e-library: collecting primary\nsources from 1965\u201375 that are associated with the Slovenian student movement of\n1968\u201372 in terms of topic, production, and\/or medium (books, journals,\nmagazines, student bulletins, miscellanea); creating a bibliography of the\nrelevant texts of the period. (Months 1\u201312.)<\/li><li>Selection and digital enhancement of texts that are digitized and made\nsearchable in the dLib library; additional digitization of relevant sources.\n(Months 6\u201312.)<\/li><li>Work on a digital corpus of literary, transliterary, and theoretical\ntexts associated with the Slovenian student movement (literary manifests and\nprograms; literary and transliterary production of neo-avant-garde groups;\nmodernist literary texts addressing the student movement at home or abroad or\nappearing in the movement\u2019s publications; theoretical texts reflecting on the\ntransformations of the literary and the social in the context of the student\nmovement); work on a structured database extracted from the digital corpus.\n(Months 6\u201318.)<\/li><li>Study of selected French theoretical, literary, and programmatic texts\nassociated with the student movement in the period 1968\u201375. (Months 1\u201318.)<\/li><li>Upgrading of the methodologies needed to interpret the selected texts and\nto quantitatively analyze the digital corpus. (Months 1\u201312.)<\/li><li>International colloquium on modernism, transliterature, and critical\ntheory at the 50<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary of May \u201968, featuring four\ninternational and four Slovenian contributors; online publication of the\npapers. (October 2018.)<\/li><li>Work on the proceedings of the October colloquium in the format of a\nspecial issue of an international peer-reviewed and indexed scholarly journal.\n(Months 6\u201312.)<\/li><li>Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the digital corpus; work on and\npublication of at least three research articles in international peer-reviewed\nand indexed journals: a) on the selected Slovenian texts; b) on Slovenian and\nFrench literary and theoretical production associated with May \u201968; c) on the\nfindings of the analysis of the digital corpus. (Months 12\u201324.)<\/li><li>Work on an exhibition of literary and theoretical works manifesting\nsocial, ideological, personal, memorial, or conceptual links between the\nrevolutions of 1968 and 1989. (Months 6\u201316.)<\/li><li>International conference on\nthe legacy of May \u201968 at the 30<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary of the revolution of\n1989: some twenty international and Slovenian contributors (mainly literary and\ncultural historians, sociologists, art historians, and philosophers). (November\n2019.)<\/li><li>Launch of the exhibition of the\nliterary and theoretical works that manifest links between the revolutions of\n1968 and 1989; a co-located round table targeting Slovenian media as well as\nthe audience of the exhibition. (November 2019.)<\/li><li>Work on a freely accessible\nproject website with the following features: a) a digitized corpus of texts; b)\na structured database; c) results of corpus analysis; d) pre-published and\/or\npublished versions of the articles written by the project team; e) a\nbibliography; f) visual material. (Months 24\u201336.)<\/li><li>Work on and publication of\nat least three research articles in international peer-reviewed and indexed\njournals. (Months 24\u201336.)<\/li><li>Work on a research monograph\non the topic of the project. (Months 12\u201336.)<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>With\na digital corpus, a bibliography of the relevant texts of the years 1968\u201372, a research\nmonograph, a special issue of an international journal, an exhibition, and a\nseries of individual research articles as its main outputs, the project\u2019s\nfeasibility is guaranteed by the individual and institutional capacities of the\nproject team. Project leader (PL) is a renowned scholar of Slovenian studies,\ncomparative literature, and literary theory, who has published widely read\nEnglish-language monographs on both the literature and the theory of the period\nin question, as well as numerous peer-reviewed journal articles employing and\nassessing the methods proposed for this project, especially world literature\nstudies, world-systems analysis, and the theory of intertextuality.\nInstitutionally, PL is able to use the resources of the Institute of Slovenian\nLiterature in Ljubljana, which he heads, and the Faculty of Arts in Ljubljana,\nwhere he teaches, as well as the international network that he can use as a\nmember of Academia Europaea and ESCL\/SELC and as an editorial-board member of <em>arcadia<\/em>, <em>CLCWeb<\/em>, and <em>Primerjalna\nknji\u017eevnost<\/em>. These will be further augmented by the other members of PL\u2019s\ninter-disciplinary and inter-institutional project team.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Tribuna_19680520-5-1-707x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-561\" width=\"348\" height=\"511\"\/><figcaption> <em>Tribuna<\/em>, 20 May 1968 <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Bibliography<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Anderson,\nPerry. \u201cModernity and Revolution.\u201d <em>New\nLeft Review <\/em>I\/144 (1984):\n96\u2013113.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Arrighi, Giovanni; Terence Hopkins; Immanuel\nWallerstein. \u201c1968: The Great Rehearsal.\u201d <em>Antisystemic\nMovements<\/em>. London: Verso, 1989. 97\u2013118.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014\u2014\u2014. \u201c1989, the Continuation of 1968.\u201d <em>Review<\/em> 15.2 (1992): 221\u201342. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bahun,\nSanja. \u201cThe Balkans Uncovered: Toward <em>Histoire\nCrois\u00e9e<\/em> of Modernism.\u201d <em>The Oxford\nHandbook of Global Modernisms<\/em>. Eds. Mark Wollaeger; Matt Eatough. Oxford:\nOxford UP, 2012. 25\u201347.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ba\u0161kovi\u010d,\nCiril; Pavle Gantar; Marjan Pungartnik; Pavle Zgaga. <em>\u0160tudentsko gibanje 1968\u201372<\/em>. Ljubljana: Republi\u0161ka konferenca ZSMS,\n1982.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Beecroft,\nAlexander. <em>An Ecology of World Literature<\/em>. London: Verso, 2015.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Beogradski univerzitet i 68.\nZbornik dokumenata o studentskim demonstracijama. <\/em>Beograd: CMU, 1989.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Berglieb,\nKlaus. <em>1968: Literatur in der\nantiautor\u00e4ren Bewegung<\/em>. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1993.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bourdieu, Pierre. <em>Homo Academicus.<\/em> Paris: Minuit, 1992.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Brinton, Maurice.<em>\nParis: May 1968<\/em>. London: Solidarity, 1969.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Casanova,\nPascale. <em>La R\u00e9publique mondiale des\nLettres<\/em>. Paris: Seuil, 1999.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Caute,\nDavid. <em>The Year of the Barricades: A Journey\nThrough 1968<\/em>. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1988.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u010cepi\u010d,\nZdenko. \u00bbBurno leto 1968. Politi\u010dna sprostitev. Zaton partijskega liberalizma.\u00ab\n<em>Slovenska novej\u0161a zgodovina<\/em>. 2. Eds.\nJasna Fischer et al. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga, 2005. 1054\u201366, 1069\u201375.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Combes,\nPatrick. <em>Mai 68, les \u00e9crivains, la\nlitt\u00e9rature<\/em>. Paris: L\u2019Harmattan 2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Djuri\u0107,\nDubravka; Mi\u0161ko \u0160uvakovi\u0107, eds.<em>\nImpossible Histories: Historical Avant-Gardes, Neo-Avant-Gardes, and\nPost-Avant-Gardes in Yugoslavia, 1918\u20131991<\/em>. Cambridge (MA): MIT P, 2003.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Doyle,\nLaura; Laura Winkiel, eds. <em>Geomodernisms:\nRace, Modernism, Modernity.<\/em> Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2005.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Drake,\nDavid. <em>Intellectuals and Politics in\nPost-War France<\/em>. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dreyfus-Armand,\nGenevi\u00e8ve; et al. <em>Les ann\u00e9es 68. <\/em>Bruxelles:\nComplexe, 2000.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dutschke,\nRudi. Mein langer Marsch. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1980<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Elbaum, Max. <em>Revolution\nin the Air: Sixties Radicals Turn to Lenin, Mao and Che<\/em>. London: Verso,\n2002.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Felsch, Philipp.<em>\nDer lange Sommer der Theorie: Geschichte einer Revolte <\/em><em>1960\u20131990<\/em>. Munich:\nC.H. Beck, 2015.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ferry, Luc; Alain Renaut. <em>French Philosophy of the Sixties<\/em>. Trans. Mary H. S. Cattani. Amherst:\nU of Massachusetts P, 1990.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fichter,\nMadigan. \u201cYugoslav Protest: Student Rebellion in Belgrade, Zagreb and Sarajevo\n1968.\u201d <em>Slavic Review<\/em> 75 (2016):\n99\u2013121.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fink,\nCarole; Philipp Gassert; Detlef Junker, eds. <em>1968: The World Transformed<\/em>. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Friedman, Susan Stanford. <em>Planetary Modernisms.<\/em> New York: Columbia UP, 2015.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gabri\u010d, Ale\u0161. \u00bbIntelektualci kot opozicija. Pribli\u017eevanje\nkulturnih dobrin \u0161ir\u0161emu krogu ljudi. Obra\u010dun s kulturni\u0161ko opozicijo.\nSpro\u0161\u010dena \u0161estdeseta leta v kulturi. Intelektualci v prime\u017eu \u2018svin\u010denih let\u2019.\nMed modernizmom in postmodernizmom. Popularna kultura.\u00ab <em>Slovenska novej\u0161a zgodovina<\/em>. 2. Eds. Jasna Fischer et al.\nLjubljana: Mladinska knjiga, 2005. 1024\u201335, 1056\u201369, 1125\u201327, 1139\u201343.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Habjan, Jernej. \u201cFrom Cultural Third-Worldism to the\nLiterary World-System.\u201d <em>CLCWeb <\/em>15.5\n(2013). Web.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Hoyles, Andre. \u201cGeneral Strike: France 1968.\u201d <em>Trade Union Register<\/em>\n1969. Web.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jakovljevi\u0107,\nBranislav. <em>Alienation Effects:\nPerformance and Self-Management in Yugoslavia, 1945\u201391.<\/em> Ann Arbor: U of\nMichigan P, 2016.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jameson,\nFredric. <em>A Singular Modernity<\/em>.\nLondon: Verso, 2002.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Juvan,\nMarko. <em>History and Poetics of Intertextuality. <\/em>West Lafayette: Purdue\nUP, 2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014\u2014\u2014.\n<em>Pre\u0161ernovska\nstruktura in svetovni literarni sistem<\/em>. Ljubljana: LUD Literatura,\n2012.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014\u2014\u2014.\n\u201cWorlding Literatures between Dialogue and Hegemony.\u201d <em>CLCWeb <\/em>15.5 (2013). Web.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kanzleiter,\nBoris. \u201c1968 in Yugoslavia.\u201d <em>Between\nPrague Spring and French May<\/em>. Eds. Martin Klimke; Jacco\nPekelder; Joachim Scharloth. New York: Berghahn Books, 2011. 84\u2013100.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014\u2014\u2014;\nKrunoslav Stojakovi\u0107, eds.<em> 1968 in\nJugoslawien<\/em>. Bonn: Dietz, 2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Katsiaficas, George N. <em>The Imagination of the New Left: A Global Analysis of 1968.<\/em>\nCambridge (MA): South End P, 1987.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Klasi\u0107,\nHrvoje. <em>Jugoslavija i svijet 1968<\/em>.\nZagreb: Ljevak, 2012.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Koron,\nAlenka. \u201cThe Impact of European Structuralism on Slovenian Literary Criticism,\n1960\u20132000.\u201d <em>Slovene studies<\/em>\n36.1 (2014): 3\u201317.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kurlansky,\nMark. <em>1968: The Year that Shook the World<\/em>.\nNew York: Random House, 1998.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lesjak,\nJure. \u00bbO transformaciji in radikalizaciji \u0161tudentskih gibanj\u00ab. <em>\u010cKZ<\/em> 39.244 (2011): 121\u201327.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mihevc,\nBogomir. <em>Klju\u010d je v na\u0161ih rokah!\n\u0160tudentska gibanja za univerzo in bolj\u0161i \u0161tudij. <\/em>Ljubljana: Univerza v\nLjubljani, 2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Miller, Mark.\n\u201cYugoslavia\u2019s 1968.\u201d. <em>Promises of 1968<\/em>. Ed. Vladimir\nTismaneanu. Budapest: CEU P, 2011. 227\u201340.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Moretti,\nFranco. <em>Distant Reading<\/em>. London:\nVerso, 2013.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2014\u2014\u2014.\n<em>Signs Taken for Wonders: On the Sociology\nof Literary Forms. Second Edition<\/em>. London: Verso, 2005.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Neubauer,\nJohn; Marcel Cornis-Pope. \u201c1956\/1968: Revolt, Suppression, and Liberalization\nin Post-Stalinist East-Central Europe.\u201d <em>History\nof the Literary Cultures of East-Central Europe. <\/em>1. Eds. Marcel\nCornis-Pope; John Neubauer. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004.\n82\u2013105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Poni\u017e,\nDenis. \u00bb\u0160estdeseta leta. Poetika lingvizma in novega (jezikovnega) simbolizma.\nSedemdeseta in osemdeseta leta. Oblika kot sredi\u0161\u010dni pesni\u0161ki problem. Pesni\u0161ki\nlet generacije, rojene v za\u010detku \u0161estdesetih let.\u00ab Jo\u017ee Poga\u010dnik et al., <em>Slovenska knji\u017eevnost <\/em>III. Ljubljana:\nDZS, 2001. 103\u201313, 116\u201340.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Popov,\nNeboj\u0161a. <em>Dru\u0161tveni sukobi izazov\nsociologiji. \u00bbBeogradski jun\u00ab 1968. <\/em>Beograd: Glasnik, 2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ramalho\nSantos, Irene; Ant\u00f3nio Sousa Ribeiro, eds. <em>Translocal\nModernisms: International Perspectives.<\/em> Bern: Peter Lang, 2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ram\u0161ak, Jure. <em>Opore\u010dni\u0161tvo v\nsamoupravnem socializmu: vsebina in polo\u017eaj dru\u017ebene kritike v Sloveniji,\n1972\u20131980 : doktorska disertacija<\/em>. Koper : [J. Ram\u0161ak], 2013. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ross,\nKristin. <em>May &#8217;68 and Its Afterlives.<\/em>\nChicago: U of Chicago P, 2002.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rubin,\nJerry. <em>Do It. Scenarios of the Revolution<\/em>.\nNew York: Simon and Schuster, 1970.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sartre,\nJean-Paul. <em>Situations, VIII: Autour de\n68. <\/em>Paris: Gallimard, 1972.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Starr,\nPeter. <em>Logics of Failed Revolt: French Theory after May \u201968<\/em>. Stanford:\nStanford UP, 1995.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0160trajn, Darko.\u00bbKako razumeti \u0161tudentska\ngibanja?\u00ab <em>Zgodovina v \u0161oli<\/em> 17.3\u20134\n(2008): 1\u20137.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0160uvakovi\u0107,\nMi\u0161ko. <em>Anatomija angelov: razprave o umetnosti in teoriji v Sloveniji po letu\n1960.<\/em> Trans. Vlasta Vi\u010di\u010d. Ljubljana: Sophia, 2001.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Troha, Ga\u0161per. <em>Ujetniki\nsvobode: slovenska dramatika in dru\u017eba med letoma 1943\u20131990<\/em>. Maribor:\nAristej; Ljubljana: AGRFT, 2015.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Wallerstein, Immanuel. \u201c1968, Revolution in the\nWorld-System.\u201d <em>Geopolitics&nbsp; and&nbsp;\nGeoculture: Essays on the Changing World-System. <\/em>Cambridge:\nCambridge UP, 1991. 65\u201383. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Wollaeger,\nMark; Matt Eatough, eds. <em>The Oxford\nHandbook of Global Modernisms<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2012.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Scientific Background, Problem Identification and Objective of the Proposed Research The 50th anniversary of the worldwide student and workers movement of 1968, with its impact on Slovenia and other republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, gives this research &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/about\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-7","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7"}],"version-history":[{"count":35,"href":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1296,"href":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7\/revisions\/1296"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maj68.zrc-sazu.si\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}